Preview

New St. Petersburg Medical Records

Advanced search

Sublingual Bupraxon Tablets in Cancer Patients: Initial Results from Real-World Clinical Practice

https://doi.org/10.24884/1609-2201-2025-104-4-68-76

Abstract

Introduction. Adequate pain management in cancer patients remains a serious challenge. Long-term and uncontrolled use of NSAIDs is associated with a high risk of complications, while the use of opioids is often limited by their adverse effects, particularly constipation, and the potential risk of diversion. Combination drugs such as Bupraxon (buprenorphine + naloxone) represent a promising alternative.
Objective. To present to the medical community the initial clinical experience with the domestic combined drug Bupraxon for sublingual administration in cancer patients with chronic pain syndrome (CPS).
Methods and materials. This paper presents the results of a post-marketing observational study involving 22 cancer patients with CPS, as well as two detailed clinical case reports. The analgesic efficacy, time to onset and duration of action, tolerability, and safety of the drug were assessed in a real-world clinical setting.
Results. Bupraxon was shown to provide effective control of moderate to severe intensity pain. The onset of action was observed within 30–45 minutes, and the duration of analgesia was 4–8 hours. For 12 out of 22 patients, an effective dose was titrated within 2–3 days. The drug was well-tolerated, with no significant gastrointestinal adverse events (specifically, no constipation) and no withdrawal syndrome following short-term use. The combination with naloxone enhances narcological safety by reducing the risk of abuse.
Conclusions. Bupraxon is an effective and safe option for the management of CPS in cancer patients, particularly in those at risk of bowel obstruction. Its non-invasive form, controllable analgesia, and favorable safety profile make it a promising alternative to other opioid analgesics. Further comparative studies are required for a comprehensive assessment of the drug's potential.

About the Authors

G. R. Abuzarova
P. A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – a branch of the National Medical Research Centre for Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Guzel R. Abuzarova, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Palliative Care Center for Cancer Patients; Professor, Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine named after Academician A. I. Savitsky

Moscow



M. A. Vernyuk
P. A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – a branch of the National Medical Research Centre for Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Maria A. Vernyuk, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Head, Department of High-Dose Chemotherapy with Bone Marrow Transplantation Unit, Department of Drug Therapy for Tumors

Moscow



E. V. Verbitskaya
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Elena V. Verbitskaya, Cand. of Sci. (Biol.), Candidate of Biological Sciences (Ph.D.), Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine

Saint Petersburg



M. V. Pchelintsev
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Mikhail V. Pchelintsev, Cand. of Sci. (Med.), Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Evidence-Based Medicine

Saint Petersburg



R. R. Sarmanaeva
P. A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute – a branch of the National Medical Research Centre for Radiology of the Ministry of Health of Russia; Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Regina R. Sarmanaeva, Physician, Palliative Care Center for Cancer Patients; Assistant, Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine named after Academician A. I. Savitsky

Moscow



E. E. Zvartau
Pavlov University
Russian Federation

Edwin E. Zvartau, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of Department of Pharmacology

Saint Petersburg



References

1. van den Beuken-van Everdingen M. H. J., Hochstenbach L. M. J., Joosten E. A. J. et al. Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016;51(6):1070–1090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340.

2. Chronic pain syndrome in adult patients requiring palliative medical care: clinical guidelines. Approved by the Ministry of Health of Russia. 2023. (In Russ.). URL: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/400_2 (accessed: 03.02.26).

3. Bupraxon: instructions for medical use. (In Russ.). URL: https://cdn.pharm-portal.ru/69jxs7cjr4n4gdc2acy5y4x8/instructions/%D0%9B%D0%9F-003748/InstrImg_2023_05_04_1492957/d596f484-726b-47c3-a494-25659e8d8e9e.pdf (accessed: 03.02.26).

4. Sadée W., Rosenbaum J. S., Herz A. Buprenorphine: differential interaction with opiate receptor subtypes in vivo. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1982;223(1):157–162. PMID: 6288917.

5. Negus S. S., Picker M. J., Dykstra L. A. Kappa antagonist properties of buprenorphine in non-tolerant and morphine-tolerant rats. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1989;98(1):141–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00442021.

6. Jasinski D. R., Pevnic J. S., Griffit J. D. Human pharmacology and abuse potential of the analgesic buprenorphine: a potential agent for treating narcotic addiction. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1978;35(4):501–516. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1978.01770280111012.

7. Brewster D., Humphrey M. J., Mcleavy M. A. The systemic bioavailability of buprenorphine by various routes of administration. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1981;33(8):500–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2042-7158.1981.tb13848.x.

8. Kuhlman J. J. Jr, Lalani S., Magluilo J. Jr et al. Human pharmacokinetics of intravenous, sublingual, and buccal buprenorphine. J Anal Toxicol. 1996;20(6):369–378. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/20.6.369.

9. Bullingham R. E., McQuay H. J., Dwyer D. et al. Sublingual buprenorphine used postoperatively: clinical observations and preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1981;12(2):117–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1981.tb01189.x.

10. Cicero T. J., Inciardi J. A., Muñoz A. Trends in abuse of Oxycontin and other opioid analgesics in the United States: 2002-2004. J Pain. 2005;6(10):662–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2005.05.004.

11. Partanen T. A., Vikatmaa P., Tukiainen E. et al. Outcome after injections of crushed tablets in intravenous drug abusers in the Helsinki University Central Hospital. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2009;37(6):704–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.01.016.

12. Obadia Y., Perrin V., Feroni I. et al. Injecting misuse of buprenorphine among French drug users. Addiction. 2001;96(2):267–272. https:// doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.96226710.x.

13. Vidal-Trecan G., Varescon I., Nabet N., Boissonnas A. Intravenous use of prescribed sublingual buprenorphine tablets by drug users receiving maintenance therapy in France. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;69(2):175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00312-5.

14. Aitken C. K., Higgs P. G., Hellard M. E. Buprenorphine injection in Melbourne, Australia-an update. Drug Alcohol Rev. 2008;27(2):197– 199. https://doi.org/10.1080/09595230701829553.

15. Jenkinson R. A., Clark N. C., Fry C. L., Dobbin M. Buprenorphine diversion and injectionin Melbourne, Australia: anemergingissue? Addiction.2005;100(2):197– 205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00958.x.

16. Harris D. S., Jones R. T., Welm S. et al. Buprenorphine and naloxone co- administration in opiate-dependent patients stabilized on sublingual buprenorphine. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000;61(1):85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(00)00126-5.

17. Bullingham R. E., McQuay H. J., Porter E. J. et al. Sublingual buprenorphine used postoperatively: ten hour plasma drug concentration analysis. BrJClin Pharmacol. 1982;13(5):665–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.1982.tb01434.x.

18. Chiang C. N., Hawks R. L. Pharmacokinetics of the combination tablet of buprenorphine and naloxone. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2003;70(2 Suppl):S39–S47. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0376-8716(03)00058-9.

19. Pchelintsev M. V. Comparative study of the analgesic effect of buprenorphine and combinations of buprenorphine with naloxone in different ratios during sublingual administration to Wistar rats using the “tail flick” method. Uchenye zapiski Sankt- Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo meditsinskogo universiteta im. akad. I. P. Pavlova. 2012;19(4):61–66. (In Russ.).

20. Pchelintsev M. V., Zvartau E. E. Preclinical study ofanew domestic analgesic drug based on buprenorphine and naloxone (Bupraxon), characterized by a powerful analgesic effect and low narcogenic potential. Klinicheskaya farmakologiya i terapiya. 2005;(4 Suppl):211–212. (In Russ.).

21. Zhurkovich I. K., Rudenko A. O., Chelovechkova V. V. et al. Determination of buprenorphine and naloxone in patient plasma by HPLC-mass spectrometry. Khimiko-farmatsevticheskiy zhurnal. 2014;48(10):51–56. https://doi.org/10.30906/0023-1134-2014-48-10-51-56. (In Russ.).


Review

For citations:


Abuzarova G.R., Vernyuk M.A., Verbitskaya E.V., Pchelintsev M.V., Sarmanaeva R.R., Zvartau E.E. Sublingual Bupraxon Tablets in Cancer Patients: Initial Results from Real-World Clinical Practice. New St. Petersburg Medical Records. 2025;(4):68-76. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1609-2201-2025-104-4-68-76

Views: 119

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-2201 (Print)