Targeted therapy for asthma: from theory to clinical practice
https://doi.org/10.24884/1609-2201-2025-104-4-45-52
Abstract
The aim of the study was to evaluate the possibility of reducing doses of systemic glucocorticosteroids in patients with severe bronchial asthma receiving standard stage V therapy in combination with genetically engineered biological therapy.
Methods and materials. An open observational, single-center prospective study was conducted in the conditions of the pulmonary allergy center of the KKB Krasnoyarsk, which included 66 patients with severe bronchial asthma. Among the studied patients, women were found in 75% (46 people), men in 25% (17 people) of cases; the average age was 55 [48; 62] years, the duration of the disease was 21 [14.5; 34] years, and the age of onset corresponded to 34 [30.5; 50] years. The duration of treatment with the immunobiological drug Dupilumab was 4 years in 6 (9%) patients, 3 years in 13 (20%) patients, 28 (42%) patients received genetically engineered biological therapy for 2 years, and 19 (29%) patients had an allergic phenotype of asthma for 12 months. 49 (74%) patients, non-allergic phenotype was determined in 17 (26%) patients.
Results. At the time of the appointment of genetically engineered therapy, all patients had daily ASTHMA symptoms, which ensured a regular need for CDBA. Clinical symptoms were objectified by the AST and ACQ-5 tests, the results of which also confirmed the absence of AD control (Median ACQ-5 – 3 points, AST-test – 15 points). After 12 months of additional therapy, the number of seizures and the need for short-term medications decreased (p<0.005). When studying the functional parameters, a significant increase in the FEV1 index and the FEV1/FVC ratio was noted against the background of 12 months of Dupilumab therapy, it is worth noting that the increase in FEV1 was 390 ml. When assessing the volume of basic therapy, it was determined that all respondents received high-dose ICS/DDBA therapy. Additional therapy with Tiotropium bromide was detected in 34% of patients, and antileukotriene drugs were used in 21% of patients. 12 people registered regular intake of SGCS. Against the background of immunobiological therapy with Dupilumab, it was possible to reduce the volume of basic therapy: DDAX to 14% and antileukotriene drugs to 14%. Complete withdrawal from the use of OCS was achieved in 9 patients. After 12 months of therapy, 3 patients took 2.5 mg of prednisone daily.
About the Authors
O. V. SimonovaRussian Federation
Olga V. Simonova, postgraduate student, Department of Hospital Therapy and Immunology, Professor; Allergologist, Department of Allergology
Krasnoyarsk
E. A. Sobko
Russian Federation
Elena A. Sobko, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Department of Hospital Therapy and Immunology, Professor; Head of Allergology Department
Krasnoyarsk
I. V. Demko
Russian Federation
Irina V. Demko, Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor, Head of the Department Hospital Therapy and Immunology, Professor; Head of the Lung and Allergology Center
Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Caminati M., Morais-Almeida M., Bleecker E. et al. Biologics and global burden of asthma: a worldwide portrait and a call for action. World Allergy Organ. J. 2021;14(2):100502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100502.
2. Federal clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation «Bronchial asthma», 2024. URL: https://spulmo.ru/upload/KR-bronhialnaya-astma-2024.pdf (accessed: 05.02.26). (In Russ.).
3. Stone B., Davis J. R., Trudo F. et al. Characterizing patients with asthma who received Global Initiative for Asthma steps 4-5 therapy and managed in a specialty care setting. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2018;39(1):27–35. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2018.39.4094.
4. O’Byrne P., Fabbri L. M., Pavord I. D. et al. Asthma progression and mortality: the role of inhaled corticosteroids. Eur. Respir. J. 2019;54(1):1900491. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00491-2019.
5. Wallrapp A., Riesenfeld S. J., Burkett P. R., Kuchroo V. K. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells in the induction and resolution of tissue inflammation. Immunol. Rev. 2018;286(1):53–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12702.
6. Hammad H., Lambrecht B. N. The basic immunology of asthma. Cell. 2021;184(6):1469–1485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.01.
7. Blaiss M. S., Castro M., Chipps B. E. et al. Guiding principles for use of newer biologics and bronchial thermoplasty for patients with severe asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017;119(6):533–540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2017.09.058.
8. Hekking P. P., Wener R. R., Amelink M. et al. The prevalence of severe refractory asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(4):896–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.042.
9. Chung K. F., Wenzel S. E., Brozek J. L. et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(2):343–373. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00202013.
10. Ramsahai J. M., Wark P. A. Appropriate use of oral corticosteroids for severe asthma. Med J Aust. 2018;209:S18–21.
11. Price D. B., Trudo F., Voorham J. et al. Adverse outcomes from initiation of systemic corticosteroids for asthma: long-term observational study. J Asthma Allergy. 2018;11:193–204.
12. D’Amato G. Therapy of allergic bronchial asthma with omalizumab – an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2003;3(2):371– 376. https://doi.org/10.1517/eobt.3.2.371.21154.
13. Lombardi C., Comberiati P., Ridolo E. et al. Anti-IL-5 pathway agents in eosinophilic-associated disorders across the lifespan. Drugs. 2024;84(6):661–684. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-024-02037-0.
14. Silva J.-P., Vetterlein O., Jose J. et al. The S228P mutation prevents in vivo and in vitro IgG4 Fab-arm exchange as demonstrated using a combination of novel quantitative immunoassays and physiological matrix preparation. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290(9):5462–5469. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M114.600973.
15. Ridolo E., Pucciarini F., Nizi M. C. et al. Mabs for treating asthma: omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab. Milan, Italy: Taylor and Francis. 2020;16(10):2349–2356. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2020.1753440.
16. Kolkhir P., Akdis C. A., Akdis M. et al. Type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases: targets, therapies and unmet needs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2023;22(9):743–767. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41573-023-00750-1.
17. Ricciardolo F. L. M., Bertolini F., Carriero V. The role of dupilumab in severe asthma. Biomedicines. 2021;9(9):1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9091096.
18. Federal clinical guidelines of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation “Spirometry”, 2023. URL: https://spulmo.ru/upload/kr/Spirometria_2023.pdf?t=1 (accessed: 05.02.26). (In Russ.).
19. Ricciardolo F. L. M., Bertolini F., Carriero V. The Role of Dupilumab in Severe Asthma. Biomedicines. 2021;9:1096. https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines9091096.
20. Wenzel S., Castro M., Corren J. et al. Dupilumab efficacy and safety in adults with uncontrolled persistent asthma despite use of medium-to-high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a long-acting β2 agonist: A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled pivotal phase 2b dose- ranging trial. Lancet. 2016;388:31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30307-5.
21. Rabe K. F., Nair P., Brusselle G. et al. Efficacy and Safety of Dupilumab in Glucocorticoid-Dependent Severe Asthma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:2475–2485. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1804093.
Review
For citations:
Simonova O.V., Sobko E.A., Demko I.V. Targeted therapy for asthma: from theory to clinical practice. New St. Petersburg Medical Records. 2025;(4):45-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1609-2201-2025-104-4-45-52
JATS XML
